Immigrants from France vs Creek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Creek
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from France
Creek
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Creek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,866,791 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 49.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from France | Creek |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 12.0% | 30.8% |
Range | 10.4% | 28.5% |
Mean | 6.0% | 12.5% |
Median | 5.3% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 14.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |