Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chippewa
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,959,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 29.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.0% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 20.9% |
Range | 13.3% | 18.9% |
Mean | 5.6% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.3% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |