Immigrants from Brazil vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Chippewa
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,966,003 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 25.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Chippewa |
Minimum | 1.3% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 20.9% |
Range | 12.6% | 18.9% |
Mean | 6.0% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |