Immigrants from Malaysia vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Turkish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Turks
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Turkish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,959,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,801,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.020%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Turkish |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 11.5% |
Range | 13.3% | 10.6% |
Mean | 5.6% | 5.7% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Turks by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |