Immigrants from Malaysia vs Luxembourger Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Luxembourger
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Luxembourgers
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Luxembourger Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,959,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,679,340 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 1.0% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 14.4% | 12.6% |
Range | 13.3% | 11.5% |
Mean | 5.6% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Luxembourgers by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Bulgarian (5.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Argentina (5.6%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |