Immigrants from Belgium vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belgium
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belgium
Chippewa
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belgium vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,707,151 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 25.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belgium | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.96% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 40.5% | 20.9% |
Range | 39.5% | 18.9% |
Mean | 8.1% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.9% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |