Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Chippewa
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,439,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 3.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.57% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 20.9% |
Range | 49.4% | 18.9% |
Mean | 12.4% | 9.1% |
Median | 9.8% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Dominica (6.9%, a difference of 0.030%), West Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Cape Verdean (6.9%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Micronesia (7.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |