Immigrants from India vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Chippewa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from India
Chippewa
4.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Chippewa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,949,483 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.376 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,009,829 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 48.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from India | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.54% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 7.8% | 20.9% |
Range | 7.3% | 18.9% |
Mean | 4.0% | 9.1% |
Median | 4.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 3.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Filipino (4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), Thai (4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 3.5%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and Cree (7.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |