Yaqui vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Yaqui
Chickasaw
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Yaqui
Chickasaw
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yaqui vs Chickasaw Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,721,250 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yaqui and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,565 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.293 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 0.11%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yaqui | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 24.2% | 42.5% |
| Range | 18.4% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 17.0% | 18.7% |
| Median | 17.8% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yaqui and Chickasaw by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yaqui are Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Subsaharan African (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Hmong (18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Choctaw (18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.7% |