Immigrants from Colombia vs Norwegian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Colombia
Norwegian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Colombia
Norwegians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Colombia vs Norwegian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 378,592,310 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,951,359 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Colombia | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 18.9% |
| Range | 7.9% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 6.8% |
| Median | 5.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Colombia and Norwegians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Colombia are Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |