Immigrants from Brazil vs Laotian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Laotian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Laotians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Laotian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,966,003 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,814,363 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.52%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Laotian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 11.4% |
Range | 12.6% | 10.4% |
Mean | 6.0% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 8.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Laotians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |