Immigrants from Brazil vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Central Americans
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,966,003 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 7.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Central American |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 13.9% | 10.3% |
Range | 12.6% | 9.0% |
Mean | 6.0% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |