Iroquois vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Iroquois
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Iroquois
Central Americans
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,272,935 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 16.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Central American |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 40.9% | 10.3% |
| Range | 37.9% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 5.5% |
| Median | 9.2% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Chippewa (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Micronesia (7.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |