Hawaiian vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Hawaiians
Central Americans
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 327,430,219 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 7.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hawaiian | Central American |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 23.7% | 10.3% |
| Range | 21.6% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 5.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (6.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |