Inupiat vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Central Americans
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,327,130 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 7.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Central American |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 18.0% | 10.3% |
| Range | 16.9% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 5.5% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |