Immigrants from Kuwait vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Kuwait
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Kuwait
Central Americans
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,900,049 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kuwait and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Kuwait | Central American |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 9.4% | 10.3% |
Range | 8.1% | 9.0% |
Mean | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kuwait by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kuwait are Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |