Immigrants from the Azores vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Subsaharan African
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Sub-Saharan Africans
10.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,193,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 5.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 62.5% |
Range | 20.7% | 61.7% |
Mean | 8.8% | 15.6% |
Median | 7.8% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Ghanaian (10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.95%), Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Cree (10.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |