Czech vs Ghanaian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Czech
Ghanaian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Czechs
Ghanaians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Ghanaian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,584,263 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,643,390 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.94%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 32.8% | 15.7% |
Range | 31.6% | 15.1% |
Mean | 7.7% | 5.8% |
Median | 6.6% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Ghanaians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Croatia (6.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |