Czech vs Costa Rican Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Czech
Costa Rican
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Czechs
Costa Ricans
4.7%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
27.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Costa Rican Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 413,421,008 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,333,742 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.20% |
Maximum | 35.5% | 33.3% |
Range | 35.1% | 33.1% |
Mean | 7.1% | 7.6% |
Median | 5.0% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 7.0% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Norwegian (4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Lebanese (4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Kenyan (4.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Iraqi (4.7%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Creek | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Lebanese | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Iraqis | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Houma | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Ugandans | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Poland (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Sioux (5.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Denmark (5.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Immigrants | Egypt | 33.2 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.2% |
Bangladeshis | 32.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.2% |
Koreans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 31.0 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.2% |
Sioux | 30.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.2% |
Immigrants | Africa | 29.6 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.2% |
Argentineans | 29.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.2% |
Costa Ricans | 27.0 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 22.5 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.2% |
Maltese | 19.6 /100 | #198 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 19.0 /100 | #199 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 18.4 /100 | #200 | Poor 5.2% |
Laotians | 18.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 17.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 5.2% |