Chilean vs Laotian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Laotian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chileans
Laotians
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Laotian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,814,363 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Laotian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 11.4% |
Range | 10.9% | 10.4% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 8.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Laotians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |