Chilean vs Immigrants from Peru Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Peru
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Peru
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Peru Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,808,215 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.31%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Peru |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 24.7% |
| Range | 10.9% | 22.8% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Peru by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |