Chilean vs Salvadoran Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Salvadoran
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chileans
Salvadorans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Salvadoran Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,824,360 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.546 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Salvadoran |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 8.9% |
| Range | 10.9% | 7.0% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 5.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Salvadorans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |