Chilean vs Palestinian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Palestinian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chileans
Palestinians
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Palestinian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,450,834 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.14%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 13.7% |
| Range | 10.9% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Palestinians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |