Chilean vs Somali Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Somali
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chileans
Somalis
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Somali Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,294,852 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.681 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.010%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Somali |
Minimum | 2.1% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 13.6% |
Range | 10.9% | 10.2% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.0% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Somalis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Vietnam (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Peruvians | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |