Chilean vs Immigrants from Lebanon Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
Immigrants from Lebanon
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Chileans
Immigrants from Lebanon
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Immigrants from Lebanon Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,632,151 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,147,801 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chilean | Immigrants from Lebanon |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 13.0% | 15.7% |
Range | 10.9% | 13.6% |
Mean | 6.3% | 6.4% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Immigrants from Lebanon by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Somali (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Palestinian (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Eastern European (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Somalia (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from El Salvador (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Kenyan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Denmark (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |