Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,445,322 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Spanish American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 7.4 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,195 compared to $45,220, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($44,010 compared to $55,712, a difference of 26.6%), and median family income ($85,728 compared to $106,453, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,573 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,085 compared to $97,623, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.2%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 17.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.66%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.46%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 86.7%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.3%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 72.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (95.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (95.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (95.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.95%), male disability (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%).