Norwegian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,625,097 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 21.4 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $64,416, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $40,297, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $103,705, a difference of 0.020%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $106,453, a difference of 0.29%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $55,712, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 35.2%), receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and family poverty (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.83%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.1%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.9%), currently married (50.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.29, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 51.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 66.4%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.87%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%).