Spanish American Indian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,977,872 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Spanish American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish American Indians corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($44,010 compared to $49,190, a difference of 11.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,573 compared to $50,041, a difference of 11.1%), and per capita income ($34,195 compared to $37,857, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,085 compared to $85,553, a difference of 1.8%), median household income ($76,670 compared to $78,327, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,561 compared to $90,909, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 29.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.2%), poverty (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 25.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 10.0%), family households (71.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and average family size (3.58 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (46.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.8%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.9%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (95.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (95.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (95.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American Indian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (26.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.5%).