Salvadoran vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,565,193 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Pima within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.592. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to a decrease of 7.3 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,449 compared to $63,262, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,842 compared to $73,365, a difference of 29.3%), and per capita income ($38,858 compared to $30,644, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,083 compared to $35,326, a difference of 5.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,198 compared to $82,821, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $51,503, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.9%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 71.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 71.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.84%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 128.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 105.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 88.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.5%), births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 43.0%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.48 compared to 3.75, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.49%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 77.0%), bachelor's degree (31.8% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.10%), 12th grade, no diploma (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 54.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%).