Marshallese vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chippewa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Marshallese
Chippewa
18.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chippewa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,733,335 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,813,465 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 20.6%, a difference of 10.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Chippewa |
Minimum | 8.7% | 7.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.3% | 92.5% |
Mean | 28.9% | 37.7% |
Median | 19.2% | 27.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.5% | 56.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.3% | 37.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.3% | 25.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.3% | 25.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Eritrea (18.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Senegal (20.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |