Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,718,256 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.402. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 8.6 Immigrants from Brazil.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $109,418, a difference of 39.8%), householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $62,364, a difference of 39.4%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $48,164, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $54,487, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $41,273, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 92.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 58.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 39.8%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 87.2%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 59.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%).