Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Guatemalan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Guatemalans
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,589,655 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 11.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 0.74% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 35.5% |
Range | 36.8% | 33.2% |
Mean | 7.2% | 11.7% |
Median | 5.8% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 6.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |