Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Pima No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Pima
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Pima
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Pima No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,491,377 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 43.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Pima |
Minimum | 0.74% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 29.6% |
Range | 36.8% | 27.1% |
Mean | 7.2% | 14.4% |
Median | 5.8% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Okinawan (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Indian (Asian) (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Jamaica (14.2%, a difference of 0.66%), Belizean (14.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Paraguayan (14.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.1% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.3% |
Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.6% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.7% |