Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Estonian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Estonians
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Estonian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.40%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Estonian |
Minimum | 0.74% | 0.84% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 47.6% |
Range | 36.8% | 46.8% |
Mean | 7.2% | 7.0% |
Median | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 7.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Estonians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |