Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swedish No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Swedish
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Swedes
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Swedish No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 534,930,678 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 45.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Swedish |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 30.8% |
Range | 36.8% | 28.9% |
Mean | 7.2% | 6.2% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Swedes by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 0.72%), Czech (6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and German (6.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |