Burmese vs Chinese Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Burmese
Chinese
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Burmese
Chinese
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Chinese Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,600,368 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,756,701 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.17%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.50% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 20.8% |
Range | 10.2% | 20.0% |
Mean | 4.6% | 5.8% |
Median | 4.5% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Chinese by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Scotch-Irish (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Scotch-Irish (4.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
British | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |