Burmese vs Sudanese Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Burmese
Sudanese
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Burmese
Sudanese
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Sudanese Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,600,368 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,013,962 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Sudanese |
Minimum | 0.50% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 16.4% |
Range | 10.2% | 15.6% |
Mean | 4.6% | 4.8% |
Median | 4.5% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Sudanese by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Scotch-Irish (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), British (4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Latvian (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Welsh (4.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and Scottish (4.8%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.8% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |