Burmese vs Immigrants from Japan Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Burmese
Immigrants from Japan
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Burmese
Immigrants from Japan
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Immigrants from Japan Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,600,368 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,113,647 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.29%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | Immigrants from Japan |
Minimum | 0.50% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 7.0% |
Range | 10.2% | 4.6% |
Mean | 4.6% | 4.3% |
Median | 4.5% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 4.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.88% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 0.93% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.91% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Japan by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Scotch-Irish (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.0% |