Burmese vs British Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Burmese
British
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Burmese
British
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs British Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,600,368 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 524,963,712 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Burmese | British |
Minimum | 0.50% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 10.7% | 28.7% |
Range | 10.2% | 26.5% |
Mean | 4.6% | 7.8% |
Median | 4.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and British by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Scotch-Irish (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chinese (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Sudanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Scottish (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Bulgarian (4.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and Latvian (4.8%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.8% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Sudanese | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |