Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chinese
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chinese
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chinese Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,685,167 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,756,701 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.60% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 9.1% | 20.8% |
| Range | 8.5% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 5.8% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Chinese by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Bhutanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Korea (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Polish (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Northern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Burmese (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Paraguayans | 99.5 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Irish | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Jordanians | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.0% |