Burmese vs Chinese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Burmese
Chinese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Burmese
Chinese
1.8%
VISION DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Chinese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,767,032 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 1.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 10.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 5.6% | 6.4% |
| Range | 5.4% | 6.0% |
| Mean | 1.6% | 2.3% |
| Median | 1.5% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.43% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.68% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.67% | 1.00% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Indian (Asian) (1.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Bolivian (1.9%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Bolivia (1.8%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from China (1.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |