U.S. Virgin Islander vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Bhutanese
14.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,513,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 55.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 62.0% | 31.2% |
| Range | 59.3% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 16.8% | 8.9% |
| Median | 14.9% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (14.7%, a difference of 0.090%), British West Indian (14.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and Chippewa (14.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |