South American Indian vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Chinese
11.5%
MALE POVERTY
22.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
191st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,512,423 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 32.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 38.9% | 29.4% |
Range | 36.5% | 28.2% |
Mean | 12.8% | 9.7% |
Median | 10.3% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Israeli (11.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Uruguay (11.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Hawaiian (11.4%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.6%, a difference of 0.81%), and Sierra Leonean (11.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South America | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 11.3% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 33.3 /100 | #185 | Fair 11.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 32.9 /100 | #186 | Fair 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 31.9 /100 | #187 | Fair 11.4% |
Sierra Leoneans | 29.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.4% |
Hawaiians | 28.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.4% |
Israelis | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.5% |
South American Indians | 22.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 19.1 /100 | #192 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 17.3 /100 | #193 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 16.1 /100 | #194 | Poor 11.6% |
Arabs | 15.8 /100 | #195 | Poor 11.6% |
Hmong | 15.8 /100 | #196 | Poor 11.6% |
Delaware | 15.4 /100 | #197 | Poor 11.7% |
Iraqis | 14.7 /100 | #198 | Poor 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |