Immigrants from Cuba vs Chinese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Chinese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Chinese
12.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chinese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,880,105 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 48.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Chinese |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 28.9% | 29.4% |
Range | 25.5% | 28.2% |
Mean | 13.2% | 9.7% |
Median | 12.6% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.4% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Immigrants from Ecuador (12.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ghana (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Potawatomi (12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Sudan (12.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (8.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Taiwan (8.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 4.4%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (9.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and Immigrants from Ireland (9.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |