South American Indian vs Arab Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Arab
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Arabs
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Arab Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,036,809 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 0.39%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Arab |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.6% |
| Range | 97.4% | 48.1% |
| Mean | 31.1% | 23.1% |
| Median | 25.0% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.7% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.3% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.6% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Arabs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |