South American Indian vs Arab Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Arab
Disability
Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Arabs
11.4%
DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
DISABILITY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Arab Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,561,915 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,795,543 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.42%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Arab |
Minimum | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 22.9% | 68.2% |
Range | 18.6% | 65.2% |
Mean | 13.1% | 12.9% |
Median | 12.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 13.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Arabs by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are South African (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Brazilian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Africa (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% |
Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% |
Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.5% |