South American Indian vs Canadian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Canadian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Canadians
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Canadian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Canadian |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 13.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 97.4% | 86.4% |
| Mean | 31.1% | 39.9% |
| Median | 25.0% | 32.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.7% | 53.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.3% | 28.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 22.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.6% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Arab (20.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |