Immigrants from Uganda vs Arab Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Arab
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Arabs
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Arab Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,509,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 20.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,036,809 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Arab |
Minimum | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 53.6% |
Range | 61.2% | 48.1% |
Mean | 22.5% | 23.1% |
Median | 19.7% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.5% | 25.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Arabs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Costa Rican (20.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |