South American Indian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Immigrants from Bangladesh
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,615,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,196,728 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431 and weighted average of 22.3%, a difference of 8.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 64.6% |
Range | 97.4% | 64.4% |
Mean | 31.1% | 23.7% |
Median | 25.0% | 20.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.7% | 27.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.3% | 11.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.0% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.6% | 12.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.3%, a difference of 0.040%), West Indian (22.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bermudan (22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Cape Verdean (22.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and French (22.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Malaysians | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 22.2% |
French | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 22.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 22.3% |
Bermudans | 2.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 22.3% |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |