Costa Rican vs Arab Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Arab
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Arabs
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Arab Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 251,572,949 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 20.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,036,809 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 20.7%, a difference of 0.080%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Arab |
| Minimum | 6.5% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 69.6% | 53.6% |
| Range | 63.1% | 48.1% |
| Mean | 25.8% | 23.1% |
| Median | 22.6% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.4% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Arabs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Danish (20.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |